•1 min read•from Machine Learning
Which conference/journal do you believe currently has the most fair and accurate review process?[D]
Major conference acceptance has become pretty much random and review quality is constantly dropping.
There is always that one reviewer who understood nothing but still rejects the paper because you didn't cite "X" or compare with "Y", and the meta-reviewer usually just goes along with it. In your opinion, is there a conference or journal with a solid review process that is even slightly less random than the others?
[link] [comments]
Want to read more?
Check out the full article on the original site
Tagged with
#financial modeling with spreadsheets
#rows.com
#conference
#journal
#reviewer
#review process
#review quality
#paper
#acceptance
#random
#rejection
#solid review
#quality
#meta-reviewer
#citation
#process
#comparison
#dropping
#understood
#less random