•1 min read•from Machine Learning
AI/ML Conferences [D]
As a fellow ML researcher, I feel disheartened and discouraged after seeing the experiences of people who submitted their work to ICML 2026. Given the sheer number of papers submitted to A* AI/ML conferences, the current review system does not seem to work well. For example, in some cases, papers are rejected despite the authors addressing all reviewers’ concerns, leading to substantial increases in scores. What could be a better way forward to ensure a fair review process?
[link] [comments]
Want to read more?
Check out the full article on the original site
Tagged with
#rows.com
#natural language processing for spreadsheets
#generative AI for data analysis
#Excel alternatives for data analysis
#AI
#ML
#ICML
#review system
#conferences
#papers
#fair review process
#submitted
#authors
#reviewers
#rejected
#scores
#number of papers
#fellow researcher
#better way forward
#concerns