•1 min read•from Machine Learning
public reviews in conferences [D]
Why don't all conferences make reviews public?
I find ICLR public reviews to be very useful :
- I get an idea of how others in the field think about the work
- Makes the publishing process more transparent
- Reviewers will potentially spend more effort to avoid public scrutiny
Are there any drawbacks in having ICLR-like public reviews? (where the reviewer identifies are masked) Would the community benefit if all conferences released their reviews?
[link] [comments]
Want to read more?
Check out the full article on the original site
Tagged with
#rows.com
#public reviews
#conferences
#ICLR
#transparency
#publishing process
#reviewers
#scrutiny
#community benefit
#field
#review process
#publication ethics
#opinions
#drawbacks
#open access
#effort
#academic integrity
#research work
#masked identifiers
#peer review