•1 min read•from Machine Learning
ECCV Stupid Reviewer Behavior (Any AC here?) [R]
I am looking for guidance as I got 3 reviews 1/3, 4/3 and 4/5 but stupid reviewer 1 rejected my paper and he suggest me to conduct some more experiment and he also said that "he could change his assessment".
How is it possible that he will change the rating from 1(Reject) to 4 (Borderline Accept) after rebuttal? As I am answering his all question. But I am confused that putting too much stress and working day and night is helpful or not.
Any Area Chair opinion?
[link] [comments]
Want to read more?
Check out the full article on the original site
Tagged with
#rows.com
#natural language processing for spreadsheets
#generative AI for data analysis
#Excel alternatives for data analysis
#ECCV
#paper rejection
#reviewer behavior
#Area Chair
#rebuttal
#Borderline Accept
#academic review
#review score
#review process
#experiment
#guidance
#feedback
#peer review
#assessment
#review quality
#stress