2 min readfrom Machine Learning

EACL 2027: Author response and author-reviewer discussion are now two separate stages and allow more time [D]

EACL 2027 just published their CFP which contains an important change to the common ARR process:

For this cycle, author response and author-reviewer discussion are two separate stages

Looking at the deadlines, they not only split the process but also allow more time:

  • Author response period Sept 14-19, 2026
  • Reviewer engagement and Author-reviewer discussion Sept 20-24, 2026

Previously, ARR cycles only gave five days in total for the discussion period. ARR May 2026, for example, only gives July 7 to July 13 for the total authors-reviewer discussion (no separate author response period).

In summary, that means not only that the process is being split in two stages but you now also have more time.
---

In my opinion this is really good as in the past having just 5 days to post a reply (potentially involving new experiments - even though that is not the original idea of the discussion period) and getting into a discussion with the reviewers felt very tight - for authors and reviewers. I am, therefore, really looking forward to this change.

Any thoughts?

submitted by /u/S4M22
[link] [comments]

Want to read more?

Check out the full article on the original site

View original article

Tagged with

#natural language processing for spreadsheets
#generative AI for data analysis
#Excel alternatives for data analysis
#real-time data collaboration
#real-time collaboration
#rows.com
#financial modeling with spreadsheets
#EACL 2027
#ARR
#Author Response
#Author-Reviewer Discussion
#Reviewer Engagement
#CFP
#Deadlines
#Discussion Period
#Review Cycles
#Machine Learning
#Experiments
#Process Improvement
#Time Allocation