1 min readfrom Machine Learning

NeurIPS 2026 AI-generated reviews [D]

I'm really confused about what the point of the prompt injection was (speaking as an author). Is it just a study? I would really prefer that they took action against the AI-generated reviews. Obviously, we cannot assume that the reviewers were copy-pasting the output from the LLM without having given it any look at all, but in some cases that does look to be the case. In fact, in some cases the meta-reviewer seems to have also largely used LLMs. What exactly is the consequence here for using an LLM for reviewing?

submitted by /u/bricklerex
[link] [comments]

Want to read more?

Check out the full article on the original site

View original article

Tagged with

#AI-generated reviews
#NeurIPS
#LLM
#Prompt injection
#Reviewing
#Meta-reviewer
#Authors
#Consequence
#Machine Learning
#Study
#Action
#Copy-pasting
#Output
#AI
#Prompt
#Reviews
#Reviewers
#Data
#Models