•1 min read•from Machine Learning
NeurIPS 2026: If the rebuttal addresses your concern, please raise your score [D]
Potentially a hot take? I am not sure why our community is plagued with reviewers who, after acknowledging that their concerns were addressed by a rebuttal, decide to maintain their score because they don't vibe with the paper. So here is my plea to all reviewers: If you list a set of concerns in your review and these concerns are addressed during the rebuttal, please adjust your score accordingly. This should apply whether or not you like the paper and/or its methodology. The beauty of scientific research is that we each get to explore ideas that we find meaningful whose value may not be immediately obvious to every individual reviewer.
[link] [comments]
Want to read more?
Check out the full article on the original site
Tagged with
#NeurIPS
#reviewers
#rebuttal
#score
#scientific research
#methodology
#concerns
#review process
#peer review
#machine learning
#academic community
#evaluation
#paper
#ideas
#value
#meaningful
#acknowledgement
#submission
#hot take
#research