1 min readfrom Machine Learning

NeurIPS 2026: If the rebuttal addresses your concern, please raise your score [D]

Potentially a hot take? I am not sure why our community is plagued with reviewers who, after acknowledging that their concerns were addressed by a rebuttal, decide to maintain their score because they don't vibe with the paper. So here is my plea to all reviewers: If you list a set of concerns in your review and these concerns are addressed during the rebuttal, please adjust your score accordingly. This should apply whether or not you like the paper and/or its methodology. The beauty of scientific research is that we each get to explore ideas that we find meaningful whose value may not be immediately obvious to every individual reviewer.

submitted by /u/undesirable_12
[link] [comments]

Want to read more?

Check out the full article on the original site

View original article

Tagged with

#NeurIPS
#reviewers
#rebuttal
#score
#scientific research
#methodology
#concerns
#review process
#peer review
#machine learning
#academic community
#evaluation
#paper
#ideas
#value
#meaningful
#acknowledgement
#submission
#hot take
#research