1 min readfrom Machine Learning

NeurIPS 2026 Concept & Feasibility Track [D]

I could not find any discussion threads for the C&F track. Have people actually submitted to this track? If so, what are your reviews and scores looking like, along with post rebuttal engagement? In our case, they received reviews not in line with the policy defined for the track, where most reviewers praised originality but complained about the scope of experiments. Despite the track saying that it would be possible that the idea cannot be validated in a single paper.

We provided experiments but no dice, none of the reviewers responded. Have any ACs seen papers and reviews in this track or do authors have their experiences they could share?

Please add your scores pre and post rebuttal here

submitted by /u/MakingComputersSmart
[link] [comments]

Want to read more?

Check out the full article on the original site

View original article

Tagged with

#NeurIPS
#Concept & Feasibility Track
#C&F track
#reviews
#scores
#rebuttal
#ACs
#authors
#originality
#scope of experiments
#validation
#experiments
#policy
#submission
#MachineLearning
#NeurIPS 2026
#engagement
#idea
#paper
#reviewers