1 min readfrom Machine Learning

AAAI 2027 Review: No code submission? [D]

I am now reviewing a bunch of papers for AAAI 2027 and it has surprised me the low amount of submissions with no code implementation. I don’t know if it has been only in my batch or it is common, but I was expecting very detailed appendices + code submission since AAAI is very explicit with the topic of reproducibility. I was planning to take this into consideration when assigning my initial scores, but I would like to hear your opinions. I have always submitted my code: it gives a very good impression and after reviewing process finishes we just publish it on ArXiv, so no one “tries to stole the idea” (although I think that this is very very unlikely). So I cannot find any excuse for those submissions that do not have code implementation, specially in today’s times where AI assistants can just write an empirical paper with artificial results within a couple of hours

submitted by /u/wontonut
[link] [comments]

Want to read more?

Check out the full article on the original site

View original article

Tagged with

#AAAI
#code submission
#AAAI 2027
#code
#reproducibility
#code implementation
#empirical paper
#paper
#AI assistants
#reviewing
#artificial results
#appendices
#ArXiv
#submissions
#machine learning
#review process
#initial scores
#ideas
#artificial intelligence
#batch