1 min readfrom Machine Learning

For the people who got reviews back from neurips, cvpr, eccv, etc and also tested their paper through an agentic reviewer like the stanford one, how different were the reviews? [D]

Hello,

I was curious about the differences you can get from the human reviewers and the llms.

Any insight is welcome, thank you!

submitted by /u/obliviousphoenix2003
[link] [comments]

Want to read more?

Check out the full article on the original site

View original article

Tagged with

#reviews
#NeurIPS
#LLMs
#human reviewers
#CVPR
#ECCV
#differences
#agentic reviewer
#machine learning
#Stanford
#paper
#conference
#insight
#testing
#academic publishing
#peer review
#evaluation
#feedback
#AI
#artificial intelligence