1 min readfrom Towards Data Science

Kimi K3’s 1M Token Context Window vs. RAG: Cost, Latency and Answer Quality

Kimi K3’s 1M Token Context Window vs. RAG: Cost, Latency and Answer Quality

A controlled comparison of a top-5 RAG pipeline and a full 127,000 token prompt on the same 12 questions, same system prompt and same model. Graded blind on correctness, completeness and grounding.

The post Kimi K3’s 1M Token Context Window vs. RAG: Cost, Latency and Answer Quality appeared first on Towards Data Science.

Want to read more?

Check out the full article on the original site

View original article

Tagged with

#Kimi K3
#Context Window
#RAG
#Retrieval Augmented Generation
#Token
#Latency
#Cost
#Answer Quality
#Prompt
#Correctness
#Completeness
#Grounding
#System Prompt
#Model
#Comparison
#Data Science
#Pipeline
#1M Token
#127,000 Token
#Questions