1 min readfrom Machine Learning

Hyperparameters fine tuning for MARL comparative study [D]

hello everyone. I'm training PPO variants on different multi-agent tasks from the VMAS library (Independent PPO / Graph PPO and such, see HetGPPO by Bettini et al.).

I noticed that for every architecture/scenario couple, the optimal hyperparameters sometimes tend to vary (learning rate, entropy coefficient, KL coefficient, SGD batch size, etc).

do I need - methodologically speaking - to unify the hyperparameters of all models in order to make a fair and correct comparison of architectures later on?

note: sometimes unifying these HP leads to some non converging models.

note 2 : my objective is to test these models' robustness under adversarial attack in test-time (frozen models).

thank you in advance.

submitted by /u/ham_bam0
[link] [comments]

Want to read more?

Check out the full article on the original site

View original article

Tagged with

#MARL
#Hyperparameters
#Fine-tuning
#PPO
#Multi-agent tasks
#VMAS
#Independent PPO
#Graph PPO
#HetGPPO
#Learning Rate
#Entropy Coefficient
#KL Coefficient
#SGD Batch Size
#Architecture
#Convergence
#Robustness
#Adversarial Attack
#Test-time
#Frozen Models
#Comparative Study