2 min readfrom SustainableFashion

What does “sustainable fashion” really mean if we forget the people making it?

I've been thinking about this a lot while researching sustainable fashion.

We talk about sustainable materials.

We talk about recycled fabrics.

We talk about how a garment should be disposed of at the end of its life.

But somewhere between the beginning and the end, I feel like we forget the person who actually made the garment.

The woman sitting behind the loom.

The hands that spent hours creating every piece.

The skill she learned from her mother, and perhaps her mother learned from hers.

How is fashion truly sustainable if the person making it struggles to earn a dignified livelihood from that skill?

I've been learning more about handloom, and honestly, it has made me look at clothing differently.

There is something deeply meaningful about knowing who made something, valuing their skill, paying them fairly, and giving traditional craftsmanship a reason to survive.

I'm starting to wonder if sustainable fashion needs to ask another question:

“Is the person behind this garment being treated sustainably too?”

I'm thinking about building something around this idea, bringing handwoven textiles and fair livelihoods together.

I'd genuinely love to hear what you think.

When you buy something marketed as sustainable, how much does the treatment and livelihood of the person who made it matter to you?

submitted by /u/Rakhi__R
[link] [comments]

Want to read more?

Check out the full article on the original site

View original article

Tagged with

#sustainable fashion
#fair livelihoods
#handloom
#handwoven textiles
#craftsmanship
#ethical fashion
#dignified livelihood
#recycled fabrics
#sustainable materials
#garment disposal
#textiles
#loom
#traditional skills
#fair trade
#supply chain
#worker rights
#social impact
#circular fashion
#responsible fashion
#artisan made