[UPDATE - EIC confirmed ghost reviewer]How to get rejected by IEEE T-PAMI with 'Excellent' scores?[D]
![[UPDATE - EIC confirmed ghost reviewer]How to get rejected by IEEE T-PAMI with 'Excellent' scores?[D]](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpreview.redd.it%2Fcqkvobgi84oh1.png%3Fwidth%3D140%26height%3D116%26auto%3Dwebp%26s%3D3e5e17d5e15d788954557f4379a98b6b41ce598e&w=3840&q=75)
| Background : Our T-PAMI submission was rejected despite receiving three highly favorable reviews. The AE inadvertently revealed that the decision relied on negative comments attributed to a “fourth reviewer.” However, the actual fourth reviewer had submitted a positive review, which subsequently disappeared from the review record under the AE’s handling. We have spent the past six months pursuing this matter with IEEE. (Original post: [How to get rejected by IEEE T-PAMI with 'Excellent' scores?[D]) Latest update : A few days ago, following an investigation by the IEEE Computer Society Committee on Integrity, the T-PAMI Editor-in-Chief formally acknowledged that four reviews had in fact been received, thereby confirming the existence of the missing fourth review. [link] [comments] |
Want to read more?
Check out the full article on the original site